2000 Holden HRT vs. 2008 SSC Aero
To start off, 2008 SSC Aero is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 SSC Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 SSC Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm) has 542 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden HRT. (815 Nm). This means 2008 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden HRT.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 2008 SSC Aero | |
Make | Holden | SSC |
Model | HRT | Aero |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1062 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 380 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |