2000 Honda FCX vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 1,300 cc, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 571 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda RX-8. (215 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications: