2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche. (310 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 539 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2011 Chevrolet Avalanche | |
Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
Model | F-Type | Avalanche |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3310 mm |