2000 Jaguar XKA vs. 1962 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1962 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1962 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 348 kg more than 1962 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 648 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar XKA | 1962 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | XKA | MK II |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4399 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 466 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 843 Nm | 195 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1452 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2900 mm |