2000 Lotus Extreme vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 995 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lotus Extreme | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Lotus | Volvo |
Model | Extreme | C30 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 700 cc | 1600 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2639 mm |