2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon vs. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,700 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Chevrolet Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | 2012 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
Model | Space Wagon | Colorado |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3210 mm |