2000 Nissan Maxima vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Nissan Maxima is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Maxima (138 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Maxima should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Maxima weights approximately 125 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Nissan Maxima (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Nissan Maxima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Nissan Maxima | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Maxima | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |