2000 Oldsmobile Recon vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Recon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Recon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Oldsmobile Recon | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Proton |
| Model | Recon | 300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2450 mm |
