2000 Toyota Caserta vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Caserta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Caserta would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (228 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (300 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Toyota Caserta | 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Toyota | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Caserta | SL |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2996 cc |
| Horse Power | 71 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
