2000 Volkswagen Hac vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Hac would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 581 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Hac. (310 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Hac.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Volkswagen Hac | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Volkswagen | Cadillac |
Model | Hac | XTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 3564 cc |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 358 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1331 kg | 1912 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2837 mm |