2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1941 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 62 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 890 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1941 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | AL2 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1941 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5676 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1790 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3210 mm |
