2001 BMW M vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 BMW M is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M weights approximately 259 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M | Mustang |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |