2001 Bristol Project Fighter vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 657 kg more than 2001 Bristol Project Fighter.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Project Fighter | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Project Fighter | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 2055 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3300 mm |