2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1996 Lotus Elan

To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1996 Lotus Elan. (163 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1996 Lotus Elan.

Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Lotus Elan. 2001 Cadillac LMP has automatic transmission and 1996 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1996 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac LMP will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: