2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (320 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Grand Voyager | UTE |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |