2001 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Voyager. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chrysler Voyager. (311 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
| Model | Voyager | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
