2001 Daewoo Vada vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2001 Daewoo Vada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 994 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Vada (144 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. (122 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Vada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 2009 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 2009 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Daewoo Vada | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Vada | Polo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 122 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 2307 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2470 mm |