2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 445 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Econovan | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Econovan | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
