2001 Holden Maloo vs. 2000 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 2001 Holden Maloo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden Maloo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden Maloo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Holden Maloo | 2000 Skoda Octavia | |
Make | Holden | Skoda |
Model | Maloo | Octavia |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5663 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |