2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2004 Proton Impian
To start off, 2004 Proton Impian is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Proton Impian (101 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Proton Impian should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 Proton Impian.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Impian. (140 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Impian. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2004 Proton Impian has manual transmission. 2004 Proton Impian will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mazda CU-X | 2004 Proton Impian | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | CU-X | Impian |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1584 cc |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1205 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |