2001 Mazda CU-X vs. 2004 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2004 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saab 03-Sep (176 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 95 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saab 03-Sep (264 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Mazda CU-X | 2004 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Mazda | Saab |
| Model | CU-X | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1983 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 264 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1440 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 62 L |
