2001 Mitsubishi SUW vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 265 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Mitsubishi SUW | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | SUW | C-MAX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1905 kg | 1640 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 51 L |