2001 Pontiac Montana vs. 1972 Rover P5B

To start off, 2001 Pontiac Montana is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2001 Pontiac Montana. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 2001 Pontiac Montana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover P5B weights approximately 243 kg more than 2001 Pontiac Montana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Pontiac Montana. (210 Nm). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Pontiac Montana.

Compare all specifications: