2001 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 915 kg more than 2001 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm). This means 2010 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Celica. 2010 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 2001 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 2001 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Celica | 2010 SsangYong Rodius | |
| Make | Toyota | SsangYong |
| Model | Celica | Rodius |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1797 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1119 kg | 2034 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |
