2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1967 Volvo 120
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1967 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo 120. (144 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 1967 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Tundra | 120 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
