2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 1967 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1967 Volvo P 1800. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo P 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo P 1800. (152 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Toyota Tundra | 1967 Volvo P 1800 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Tundra | P 1800 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
