2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 505 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra. 2001 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2010 Aston Martin One-77 has manual transmission. 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
Make | Toyota | Aston Martin |
Model | Tundra | One-77 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 750 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 750 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |