2001 Toyota Tundra vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2012 Audi A3. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A3.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Toyota Tundra | 2012 Audi A3 | |
Make | Toyota | Audi |
Model | Tundra | A3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |