2002 Acura CL vs. 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura CL | 1961 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | CL | Park Avenue |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3300 mm |
