2002 Acura CL vs. 2013 Lincoln Navigator

To start off, 2013 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura CL would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (306 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2002 Acura CL. (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 1143 kg more than 2002 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura CL. (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura CL.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Acura CL 2013 Lincoln Navigator
Make Acura Lincoln
Model CL Navigator
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3210 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 260 HP 306 HP
Engine RPM 6900 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 315 Nm 495 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 105 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 2723 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 5293 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 2332 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1988 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3023 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 106 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]