2002 BMW 318 vs. 1956 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 BMW 318 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Talbot T 26 (197 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2002 BMW 318. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2002 BMW 318. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2002 BMW 318. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW 318 | 1956 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | BMW | Talbot |
| Model | 318 | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
