2002 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Morgan Aero
To start off, 2006 Morgan Aero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Morgan Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2006 Morgan Aero. (325 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Morgan Aero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Morgan Aero weights approximately 10 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Morgan Aero. (448 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Morgan Aero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 BMW M3 | 2006 Morgan Aero | |
| Make | BMW | Morgan |
| Model | M3 | Aero |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3997 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 444 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 448 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1110 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
