2002 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet SSR (296 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 569 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chevrolet SSR | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SSR | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5316 cc | 6550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2960 mm |