2002 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1993 Volkswagen Passat

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Volkswagen Passat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Volkswagen Passat would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Volkswagen Passat is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1993 Volkswagen Passat. (74 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1993 Volkswagen Passat.

Because 2002 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Volkswagen Passat, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Volkswagen Passat (150 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1993 Volkswagen Passat will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chevrolet Tracker 1993 Volkswagen Passat
Make Chevrolet Volkswagen
Model Tracker Passat
Year Released 2002 1993
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2630 mm