2002 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 476 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. (339 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chrysler Concorde. 2002 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Chrysler Concorde | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Concorde | HRT |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3517 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
