2002 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2002 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (149 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler Sebring (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Chrysler Sebring | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Sebring | 140 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 226 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2620 mm |