2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 2010 Kia Rondo
To start off, 2010 Kia Rondo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dacia Supernova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dacia Supernova would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Rondo (176 HP) has 102 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Rondo weights approximately 335 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2002 Dacia Supernova has manual transmission. 2002 Dacia Supernova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dacia Supernova | 2010 Kia Rondo | |
Make | Dacia | Kia |
Model | Supernova | Rondo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 60 L |