2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 1960 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Falcon weights approximately 75 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Kalos.
Because 1960 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Kalos | 1960 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Kalos | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2710 mm |
