2002 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Lanos (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Jeep CJ weights approximately 20 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Lanos | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Daewoo | Jeep |
Model | Lanos | CJ |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2060 mm |