2002 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2002 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dodge Neon | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Neon | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1839 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2423 mm |