2002 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Maserati Spyder
To start off, 2004 Maserati Spyder is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,254 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Spyder (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Spyder should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 595 kg more than 2004 Maserati Spyder.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Spyder (447 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Spyder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Econoline | 2004 Maserati Spyder | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Econoline | Spyder |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4254 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2450 mm |