2002 Ford Econovan vs. 1968 Renault 8
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Econovan (90 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1968 Renault 8. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econovan weights approximately 475 kg more than 1968 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Econovan | 1968 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Econovan | 8 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1789 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 59 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2270 mm |
