2002 Ford Explorer vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Ford Explorer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2002 Ford Explorer. (210 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Explorer weights approximately 469 kg more than 1996 Ford Mustang.
Because 2002 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Explorer | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Explorer | Mustang |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1939 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5240 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2580 mm |