2002 Ford F-150 vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2002 Ford F-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Plymouth Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Plymouth Neon would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Plymouth Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford F-150 (339 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford F-150 | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | F-150 | Neon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2650 mm |