2002 Ford F-150 vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2002 Ford F-150. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford F-150.
Because 2002 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford F-150. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford F-150. 2010 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford F-150 has manual transmission. 2002 Ford F-150 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford F-150 | 2010 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-150 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
