2002 Ford Mustang vs. 1975 Lancia Beta

To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1975 Lancia Beta. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1975 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 600 kg more than 1975 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Lancia Beta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Lancia Beta. (176 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Lancia Beta.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Mustang 1975 Lancia Beta
Make Ford Lancia
Model Mustang Beta
Year Released 2002 1975
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 385 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 8.9:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1660 kg 1060 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 51 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]