2002 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 3. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 277 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mustang (529 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 3. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Mustang 2013 Mazda 3
Make Ford Mazda
Model Mustang 3
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 2489 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 385 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1660 kg 1383 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4595 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]