2002 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2002 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 635 kg more than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ranger | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ranger | Camargue |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 107 L |
