2002 Holden Jackaroo vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Jackaroo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Jackaroo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (397 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (212 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 40 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (601 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Jackaroo. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Holden Jackaroo | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Jackaroo | E |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 8 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 601 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4868 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2071 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2874 mm |