2002 Jaguar X400 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Tundra. (376 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 630 kg more than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar X400. (525 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar X400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Jaguar X400 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | X400 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2430 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 4180 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 100 L |
